ISLAMABAD - Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry on Monday said that Presidential reference, sent to the court for revisiting Zulfikar Ali Bhutto murder case, was very important case ,therefore, they have to see it in a broader spectrum as Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was the first Chairman of OIC, former President and Prime Minister of the country. The Chief Justice heading an 11-member bench said there is a democratic system in the country, and its very encouraging that elected Prime Minister and the President have full confidence in the judiciary. The CJP remarked that the Supreme Court has only advisory jurisdiction under Article 186 and can give its opinion on the questions of law sent by the President, adding, 'It would have been better in such a situation the Prime Minister should have risen to occasion and got 'Bill of Attainder passed from the Parliament. According to Wikipedia, 'Bill of Attainder is an act of a legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a judicial trial. The President has referred five questions of law to the court under Article 186 seeking its opinion, he said. The Chief Justice told Babar Awan that they could not go outside the scope of Article 186. They court has to see; Is the judgment in Bhutto is a valid judgment?, and was it initiated by bias? Attorney General of Pakistan Maulvi Anwar-ul-Haq submitted the record of investigative officers reports and FIR No.402, registered against Zulfikar Ali Bhutto at Ichra police station, Lahore. Justice Javed Iqbal asked the Attorney General whether the government or the court would have to give permission to publicise the secret investigation report prepared by Justice (Retd) Shafiur Rehman. The CJP directed the Attorney General and Advocate General Punjab to sit together and consult their respective governments whether to make the report public or not? Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, one of the amicus curiae, said that the other record related to the case could also be helpful for the court in reaching a conclusion. The learned counsel said he and other amicus curiae liked to file an application for the production of the related record. The Chief Justice said that you file the application, but it would be up to the court to grant permission or not? The CJ asked Babar Awan: 'we appreciate your hard work, but at end of the day he has to satisfy the court on Article 186, under which the reference was sent to the SC. He said that they were hearing the case patiently and were not in a hurry. Federation Counsel Dr Babar Awan in his arguments submitted that the trial of case of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto is not fair and based on bias. He said the circumstances at the Lahore High Court was not conducive and even the lawyers were harassed. He said the due process of law was not adopted and the whole State machinery was diverted against Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, and also there was lack of fairness of the trial. He said one of the accused were pressurised so that he retract from his earlier statement. Justice Muhammad Sair Ali questioned: 'Is this your case that prosecutor and defender were badly treated?. The bench comprised Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Javed Iqbal, Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan, Justice Nasirul Mulk, Justice Muhammad Sair Ali, Justice Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui, Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja, Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali, Justice Khilji Arif Hussain, Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmany and Justice Ghulam Rabbani.